Table 3

Effects of ‘free caesarean’ policy on facility-based delivery

Countries with no ‘free caesarean’ policyDiff.Countries with ‘free caesarean’ policyDiff.Effect of ‘free caesarean’ policy
BeforeAfterBeforeAfterAdjusted absolute risk difference (95% CI)†Adjusted ORs (95% CI)‡
All pregnant women26 12911 59329 09717 088
  FBD rate (%)42.442.70.357.166.89.78.7 (7.7 to 9.7)***1.68 (1.48 to 1.89)***
 FBD11 07811 59316 60711 412
  Hospital delivery rate (%)60.562.52.020.431.310.99.7 (8.1 to 11.3)***1.71 (1.49 to 1.95)***
Women by level of education
 Educated14 45615 94658953725
  FBD rate (%)64.063.0−1.082.889.26.45.0 (3.0 to 7.0)***1.62 (1.35 to 1.96)***
 Non-educated11 67311 21623 20213 363
  FBD rate (%)15.613.8−1.850.560.510.09.2 (7.8 to 10.6)***1.59 (1.36 to 1.87)***
Women by zone of residence
 Urban8800914286435395
  FBD rate (%)67.870.02.279.889.39.56.4 (4.6 to 6.2)***2.14 (1.70 to 2.70)***
 Rural17 32918 02020 45411 693
  FBD rate (%)29.529.0−0.547.556.48.99.7 (8.3 to 11.1)***1.62 (1.40 to 1.87)***
 Women by wealth quintiles of households
 Q1 poorest6155614163223487
  FBD rate (%)15.19.2−5.937.250.213.016.8 (14.6 to 19.0) ***2.94 (2.34 to 3.71)***
 Q2 poorer5681633860613577
  FBD rate (%)24.326.82.546.256.19.99.3 (6.9 to 11.7)***1.47 (1.21 to 1.78)***
 Q3 middle4896553061733532
  FBD rate (%)41.646.95.353.160.77.66.0 (3.3 to 8.7)***1.31 (1.09 to 1.59)*
 Q4 richer4781497359283412
  FBD rate (%)62.064.52.567.976.38.48.2 (5.7 to 10.7)***1.66 (1.33 to 2.08)***
 Q5 richest4616418046133080
  FBD rate (%)81.784.52.890.194.44.33.3 (1.3 to 5.3)**2.03 (1.44 to 2.85)***
  • Source: DHS surveys (http://dhsprogramme.com/).

  • *P≤0.05; **P≤0.01; ***P≤0.001.

  • †The adjusted absolute risk difference represents adjusted differences between group-specific changes over time (adjusted on age, education, wealth quintile of household, parity, multiple pregnancy and took into account sampling weight).

  • ‡The adjusted ORs for the interaction between groups (free caesarean or not) and time (before vs after the implementation of the policy) were estimated using multivariate logistic regression models adjusted on maternal age, zone of residence, education, wealth quintile of household, parity, multiple pregnancy and took into account sampling weight, clustering and strata.

  • §Marginal level of significance (0.05< m < 0.10).

  • Countries with ‘free caesarean’ policy: Benin and Mali. Countries with no ‘free caesarean’ policy: Cameroon and Nigeria.

  • FBD, facility-based delivery.